GRN vs PYLD

iPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded Notes against PIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
16.9 pts
GRN is ahead
Larger fund
PYLD
$15.9B

Side by side

GRNPYLD
FundiPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded NotesPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF
IssueriPathPIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio——
Assets—$15.9B
Average daily dollar volume$20K$156M
ListedSep 10, 2019Jun 21, 2023
FrenzyCap score—100
1-month return+1.6%−1.6%
3-month return+9.3%−3.2%
Year to date+2.0%−4.8%
1-year return+11.8%−5.1%
30-day volatility21.3%5.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−30.4%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—6.60%
Holdings——
Top 10 weight——
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months——
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as of

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · GRN holdings · PYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.