GXPC vs LLMA
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF against Global X LLM ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
38%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
GXPC
$93M
Side by side
| GXPC | LLMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | Global X LLM ETF |
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Category | Communication Services | Technology |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | — |
| Assets | $93M | — |
| Average daily dollar volume | $1.7M | $72K |
| Listed | Jul 22, 2025 | Sep 30, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 42 | 1 |
| 1-month return | +4.0% | — |
| 3-month return | +1.3% | — |
| Year to date | +3.8% | — |
| 1-year return | +12.2% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 21.7% | — |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −16.6% | −5.7% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.31% | — |
| Holdings | 26 | 14 |
| Top 10 weight | 95.3% | 78.5% |
| Look-through P/E | 18.7 | 22.7 |
| Holdings vs fair value | +3.4% | −2.0% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 85% | 100% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$2.0M thru May 2026 | — |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 9, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 9, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
56% of GXPC · 55% of LLMA
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | GXPC | LLMA | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 83.2% | 64.1% | +19.1% |
| Communication Services | 13.1% | 0.0% | +13.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.2% | 2.5% | +0.7% |
More: full overlap table · GXPC holdings · LLMA holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.