HXF vs KMLM

Mast HedgeIndex Managed Futures Strategy ETF against KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
HXF is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
KMLM
$560M

Side by side

HXFKMLM
FundMast HedgeIndex Managed Futures Strategy ETFKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF
IssuerMastKraneShares
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.80%0.90%
Assets—$560M
Average daily dollar volume$154K$13M
ListedSep 28, 2012Dec 1, 2020
FrenzyCap score4153
1-month return+2.2%−0.3%
3-month return—+8.1%
Year to date—+19.5%
1-year return—+15.4%
30-day volatility6.5%12.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.7%−9.6%
Trailing 12-month yield—4.20%
Holdings—26
Top 10 weight—102.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$35M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—23.2%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · HXF holdings · KMLM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.