HYBI vs LQD

NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF against iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
54 bp
LQD is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.7 pts
HYBI is ahead
Larger fund
LQD
$28.9B

Side by side

HYBILQD
FundNEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETFiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
IssuerNEOSiShares
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateInvestment-Grade Corporate
Expense ratio0.68%0.14%
Assets$224M$28.9B
Average daily dollar volume$1.3M$3.6B
ListedSep 27, 2024Jul 22, 2002
FrenzyCap score2291
1-month return−0.6%−1.8%
3-month return−1.6%−2.9%
Year to date−4.7%−6.3%
1-year return−5.6%−8.3%
30-day volatility2.9%6.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.6%−9.8%
Trailing 12-month yield9.05%4.89%
Holdings113,185
Top 10 weight95.6%1.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$16M thru Jun 2026+$9.8B thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—8.3%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of HYBI · 0% of LQD

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · HYBI holdings · LQD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.