IBMP vs IBMS

iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF against iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
0 bp
same fee
1-year return gap
2.2 pts
IBMP is ahead
Larger fund
IBMP
$689M

Side by side

IBMPIBMS
FundiShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETFiShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
CategoryTarget Maturity MuniTarget Maturity Muni
Expense ratio0.10%0.10%
Assets$689M$365M
Average daily dollar volume$3.6M$4.3M
ListedApr 9, 2019May 22, 2024
FrenzyCap score7775
1-month return+0.1%+0.3%
3-month return−0.4%−1.0%
Year to date−0.4%−2.7%
1-year return−0.5%−2.7%
30-day volatility1.1%4.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.3%−5.9%
Trailing 12-month yield2.54%2.54%
Holdings1,8691,972
Top 10 weight3.6%4.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$24M thru Jul 2026+$36M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of IBMP · 0% of IBMS

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · IBMP holdings · IBMS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.