ICVT vs MCVT

iShares Convertible Bond ETF against Miller Convertible Total Return ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
ICVT
$7.7B

Side by side

ICVTMCVT
FundiShares Convertible Bond ETFMiller Convertible Total Return ETF
IssueriSharesMiller
CategoryConvertiblesConvertibles
Expense ratio0.20%—
Assets$7.7B—
Average daily dollar volume$78M$805K
ListedJun 2, 2015Mar 3, 2026
FrenzyCap score85—
1-month return−7.4%−2.4%
3-month return−7.8%−3.4%
Year to date+8.5%—
1-year return+4.2%—
30-day volatility16.3%9.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−15.4%−8.2%
Trailing 12-month yield1.50%0.12%
Holdings390—
Top 10 weight11.3%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.1B thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility24.9%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · ICVT holdings · MCVT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.