IFLN vs RWL

Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF against Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
16 bp
IFLN is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
RWL
$10.2B

Side by side

IFLNRWL
FundInvesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETFInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
IssuerInvescoInvesco
CategoryMulti-FactorMulti-Factor
Expense ratio0.23%0.39%
Assets$286M$10.2B
Average daily dollar volume$1.3M$38M
ListedNov 15, 2007Feb 19, 2008
FrenzyCap score6578
1-month return−3.9%+2.8%
3-month return−4.7%+4.7%
Year to date—+18.1%
1-year return—+21.3%
30-day volatility5.2%8.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.7%−7.0%
Trailing 12-month yield4.79%1.19%
Holdings121506
Top 10 weight24.3%24.7%
Look-through P/E—22.5
Holdings vs fair value—+13.5%
Holdings above 200-day average—65%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$72M thru May 2026+$394M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility16.1%14.7%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of IFLN · 0% of RWL

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorIFLNRWLGap
Consumer Discretionary0.0%17.6%−17.6%
Health Care0.0%17.5%−17.5%
Technology0.0%16.8%−16.8%
Financials0.0%13.3%−13.3%
Industrials0.0%11.4%−11.4%
Consumer Staples0.0%7.2%−7.2%
Energy0.0%6.7%−6.7%
Communication Services0.0%3.0%−3.0%
Utilities0.0%3.0%−3.0%
Materials0.0%2.5%−2.5%
Real Estate0.0%0.9%−0.9%

More: full overlap table · IFLN holdings · RWL holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.