IINC vs PYLD

Alki Consolidated Income ETF against PIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
19 bp
PYLD is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PYLD
$16.9B

Side by side

IINCPYLD
FundAlki Consolidated Income ETFPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF
IssuerAlkiPIMCO
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.75%0.56%
Assets$15M$16.9B
Average daily dollar volume$261K$202M
ListedJun 23, 2026Jun 21, 2023
FrenzyCap score2071
1-month return+1.6%−0.5%
3-month return−1.0%−3.0%
Year to date—−4.9%
1-year return—−5.4%
30-day volatility9.2%4.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−6.4%
Trailing 12-month yield3.32%6.57%
Holdings1162,036
Top 10 weight14.0%23.5%
Look-through P/E17.7—
Holdings vs fair value+10.8%—
Holdings above 200-day average76%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$15M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Nov 12, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of IINC · 0% of PYLD

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorIINCPYLDGap
Health Care8.1%0.0%+8.1%
Consumer Discretionary7.8%0.0%+7.8%
Communication Services5.3%0.0%+5.3%
Industrials5.2%0.0%+5.2%
Consumer Staples5.1%0.0%+5.1%
Utilities4.0%0.0%+4.0%
Real Estate4.0%0.0%+4.0%
Technology3.9%0.0%+3.9%
Financials2.6%0.0%+2.6%
Energy2.5%0.0%+2.5%
Materials1.4%0.0%+1.4%

More: full overlap table · IINC holdings · PYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.