INTL vs ITDF

Main International ETF against iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
34%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
73 bp
ITDF is cheaper
1-year return gap
6.2 pts
ITDF is ahead
Larger fund
INTL
$240M

Side by side

INTLITDF
FundMain International ETFiShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF
IssuerMain ManagementiShares
CategoryUS Equity (Other)Target Date
Expense ratio0.84%0.11%
Assets$240M$100M
Average daily dollar volume$481K$437K
ListedDec 1, 2022Oct 17, 2023
FrenzyCap score2046
1-month return−5.1%−1.6%
3-month return−0.5%+2.5%
Year to date+7.0%+12.4%
1-year return+6.1%+12.3%
30-day volatility14.5%10.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.5%−9.3%
Trailing 12-month yield3.46%1.47%
Holdings912
Top 10 weight100.0%99.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$18M thru Jul 2026+$14M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026third-party dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

57% of INTL · 34% of ITDF
HoldingINTLITDF
IDEV37.54%23.37%
IEMG19.89%10.52%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · INTL holdings · ITDF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.