INVG vs LQD
GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF against iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
11 bp
LQD is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.4 pts
INVG is ahead
Larger fund
LQD
$28.5B
Side by side
| INVG | LQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF | iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF |
| Issuer | GMO | iShares |
| Category | Investment-Grade Corporate | Investment-Grade Corporate |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.14% |
| Assets | $28M | $28.5B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $25K | $3.5B |
| Listed | Jun 3, 2025 | Jul 22, 2002 |
| FrenzyCap score | 40 | 92 |
| 1-month return | −1.5% | −1.9% |
| 3-month return | −3.5% | −4.3% |
| Year to date | −5.6% | −7.1% |
| 1-year return | −6.5% | −8.0% |
| 30-day volatility | 5.6% | 6.5% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −8.3% | −9.8% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 5.09% | 4.93% |
| Holdings | 131 | 3,169 |
| Top 10 weight | 10.0% | 1.5% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$3.8M thru May 2026 | +$9.8B thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 8.2% |
| Holdings as of | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · INVG holdings · LQD holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.