IPOS vs OSEA

Renaissance International IPO ETF against Harbor International Compounders ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
7%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
25 bp
OSEA is cheaper
1-year return gap
20.5 pts
IPOS is ahead
Larger fund
OSEA
$389M

Side by side

IPOSOSEA
FundRenaissance International IPO ETFHarbor International Compounders ETF
IssuerRenaissanceHarbor
CategoryIPOs & Special SituationsDeveloped ex-US
Expense ratio0.80%0.55%
Assets$10M$389M
Average daily dollar volume$35K$3.4M
ListedOct 6, 2014Sep 7, 2022
FrenzyCap score1151
1-month return−7.9%+0.3%
3-month return−10.7%−0.1%
Year to date+24.2%−2.1%
1-year return+17.6%−2.9%
30-day volatility20.1%12.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−21.0%−11.1%
Trailing 12-month yield0.69%1.27%
Holdings4930
Top 10 weight63.8%44.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.1M thru Jun 2026−$13M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility36.9%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

20% of IPOS · 7% of OSEA
HoldingIPOSOSEA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd9.89%3.67%
Galderma Group AG9.96%3.05%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorIPOSOSEAGap
Technology0.0%7.7%−7.7%
Financials0.0%3.7%−3.7%
Industrials0.0%2.6%−2.6%

More: full overlap table · IPOS holdings · OSEA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.