ISMF vs KMLM

iShares Managed Futures Active ETF against KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
ISMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
6.7 pts
KMLM is ahead
Larger fund
KMLM
$560M

Side by side

ISMFKMLM
FundiShares Managed Futures Active ETFKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF
IssueriSharesKraneShares
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.80%0.90%
Assets$60M$560M
Average daily dollar volume$1.5M$13M
ListedMar 12, 2025Dec 1, 2020
FrenzyCap score4453
1-month return+1.6%−0.3%
3-month return+3.8%+8.1%
Year to date+10.7%+19.5%
1-year return+8.7%+15.4%
30-day volatility4.8%12.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.1%−9.6%
Trailing 12-month yield5.63%4.20%
Holdings13926
Top 10 weight1.5%102.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$3.9M thru Jul 2026+$35M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—23.2%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · ISMF holdings · KMLM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.