IWF vs MIGO
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF against MIG Core ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
24%
26 shared positions
Fee gap
27 bp
IWF is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
IWF
$130.5B
Side by side
| IWF | MIGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | MIG Core ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | MIG |
| Category | Large Cap Growth | US Equity (Other) |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.45% |
| Assets | $130.5B | $758M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $477M | $2K |
| Listed | May 22, 2000 | Feb 20, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 80 | 36 |
| 1-month return | +5.4% | +5.5% |
| 3-month return | +5.2% | +3.7% |
| Year to date | +8.1% | — |
| 1-year return | +7.7% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 14.1% | 14.7% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −16.4% | −13.4% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.84% | — |
| Holdings | 376 | 49 |
| Top 10 weight | 57.6% | 49.5% |
| Look-through P/E | 33.0 | 31.6 |
| Holdings vs fair value | −4.9% | +0.6% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 80% | 71% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$1.3B thru Jun 2026 | +$104M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 17.8% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
46% of IWF · 42% of MIGO| Holding | IWF | MIGO |
|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 4.85% | 4.73% |
| MSFT | 5.62% | 3.11% |
| GOOG | 4.75% | 3.02% |
| MU | 3.38% | 2.84% |
| META | 3.75% | 2.71% |
| LLY | 2.70% | 1.58% |
| LRCX | 1.16% | 1.59% |
| PANW | 0.93% | 1.07% |
| KLAC | 0.74% | 1.13% |
| NVDA | 15.57% | 0.62% |
| WDC | 0.39% | 1.89% |
| SNOW | 0.33% | 0.52% |
| DDOG | 0.26% | 1.20% |
| SPOT | 0.24% | 0.34% |
| BX | 0.19% | 0.87% |
| CIEN | 0.17% | 1.06% |
| P | 0.12% | 0.83% |
| DXCM | 0.09% | 2.93% |
| MDB | 0.08% | 0.80% |
| ARES | 0.07% | 0.93% |
| ZS | 0.07% | 0.54% |
| RDDT | 0.06% | 0.85% |
| RBRK | 0.04% | 0.79% |
| COHR | 0.03% | 1.40% |
| CELH | 0.01% | 2.59% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | IWF | MIGO | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 70.6% | 35.4% | +35.2% |
| Industrials | 11.2% | 3.8% | +7.4% |
| Health Care | 5.4% | 6.6% | −1.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.4% | 0.0% | +7.4% |
| Financials | 1.3% | 4.2% | −2.8% |
| Materials | 1.1% | 4.1% | −3.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.4% | 3.0% | −2.5% |
| Communication Services | 1.2% | 0.3% | +0.9% |
| Utilities | 0.5% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
| Real Estate | 0.4% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
| Energy | 0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
| Other | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
More: full overlap table · IWF holdings · MIGO holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.