IWMW vs QYLD

iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF against Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
21 bp
IWMW is cheaper
1-year return gap
16.8 pts
QYLD is ahead
Larger fund
QYLD
$8.5B

Side by side

IWMWQYLD
FundiShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETFGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
IssueriSharesGlobal X
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.39%0.60%
Assets$55M$8.5B
Average daily dollar volume$544K$69M
ListedMar 14, 2024Dec 11, 2013
FrenzyCap score4082
1-month return−3.0%+2.5%
3-month return−4.8%+3.0%
Year to date−3.5%+5.8%
1-year return−7.9%+8.9%
30-day volatility9.8%5.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−12.3%−7.0%
Trailing 12-month yield20.12%11.40%
Holdings3104
Top 10 weight100.2%49.2%
Look-through P/E—35.0
Holdings vs fair value—−4.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—79%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$5.6M thru Jul 2026−$250M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility21.7%15.8%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of IWMW · 0% of QYLD

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorIWMWQYLDGap
Technology0.0%73.2%−73.2%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%14.2%−14.2%
Industrials0.0%6.4%−6.4%
Health Care0.0%4.3%−4.3%
Communication Services0.0%2.5%−2.5%
Consumer Staples0.0%1.8%−1.8%
Utilities0.0%1.1%−1.1%
Materials0.0%1.0%−1.0%
Financials0.0%0.2%−0.2%
Energy0.0%0.2%−0.2%

More: full overlap table · IWMW holdings · QYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.