JLQD vs LQD

Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF against iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
6 bp
LQD is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.7 pts
JLQD is ahead
Larger fund
LQD
$28.5B

Side by side

JLQDLQD
FundJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETFiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
IssuerJanus HendersoniShares
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateInvestment-Grade Corporate
Expense ratio0.20%0.14%
Assets$16M$28.5B
Average daily dollar volume$22K$3.5B
ListedSep 8, 2021Jul 22, 2002
FrenzyCap score4392
1-month return−1.9%−1.9%
3-month return−4.0%−4.3%
Year to date−6.9%−7.1%
1-year return−7.2%−8.0%
30-day volatility4.8%6.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.0%−9.8%
Trailing 12-month yield5.74%4.93%
Holdings1503,169
Top 10 weight15.9%1.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$10M thru Jul 2026+$9.8B thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—8.2%
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · JLQD holdings · LQD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.