JMUB vs MNBD
JPMorgan Municipal ETF against ALPS BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
2%
21 shared positions
Fee gap
26 bp
JMUB is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.9 pts
MNBD is ahead
Larger fund
JMUB
$9.2B
Side by side
| JMUB | MNBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | JPMorgan Municipal ETF | ALPS BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF |
| Issuer | JPMorgan | ALPS |
| Category | National Muni | National Muni |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.44% |
| Assets | $9.2B | $56M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $194M | $125K |
| Listed | Oct 29, 2018 | May 19, 2022 |
| FrenzyCap score | 90 | 30 |
| 1-month return | +4.2% | +3.8% |
| 3-month return | −0.8% | −0.7% |
| Year to date | −2.2% | −1.5% |
| 1-year return | −2.3% | −1.4% |
| 30-day volatility | 5.5% | 6.2% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −7.8% | −7.5% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.79% | 3.45% |
| Holdings | 2,215 | 198 |
| Top 10 weight | 5.4% | 14.3% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$1.1B thru Aug 2026 | +$1.9M thru Aug 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Nov 6, 2026issuer data | as of Aug 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
2% of JMUB · 11% of MNBD| Holding | JMUB | MNBD |
|---|---|---|
| SAN ANTONIO TEX VAR 02/55, due Feb 1, 2055 | 0.29% | 0.43% |
| MAIN STR ENERGY 5% 12/33, due Dec 1, 2033 | 0.22% | 0.46% |
| CALIFORNIA CMNTY 5% 06/36, due Jun 1, 2036 | 0.22% | 0.47% |
| MAIN STR NAT VAR 04/54, due Apr 1, 2054 | 0.17% | 0.28% |
| ILLINOIS HSG DEV 6% 10/55, due Oct 1, 2055 | 0.15% | 0.94% |
| NEW YORK ST TWY 5% 03/42, due Mar 15, 2042 | 0.14% | 0.18% |
| FEDERAL HOME LN VAR 10/40, due Oct 25, 2040 | 0.13% | 0.49% |
| NORTH 6.25% 07/57, due Jul 1, 2057 | 0.10% | 0.98% |
| FORT BEND TEX VAR 08/56, due Aug 1, 2056 | 0.09% | 0.44% |
| ILLINOIS HSG 6.5% 10/56, due Oct 1, 2056 | 0.08% | 0.50% |
| CALIFORNIA CMNTY 5% 07/35, due Jul 1, 2035 | 0.06% | 0.38% |
| TEXAS MUN GAS VAR 01/55, due Jan 1, 2055 | 0.06% | 0.59% |
| LEE CNTY FLA VAR 10/56, due Oct 1, 2056 | 0.03% | 0.23% |
| SOUTHEAST ENERGY 5% 09/35, due Sep 1, 2035 | 0.03% | 0.58% |
| FEDERAL HOME LN VAR 12/42, due Dec 25, 2042 | 0.03% | 0.90% |
| MAIN STR NAT VAR 12/53, due Dec 1, 2053 | 0.03% | 0.56% |
| MONTANA ST BRD VAR 11/46, due Nov 1, 2046 | 0.02% | 0.48% |
| TEXAS ST UNIV 5% 03/31, due Mar 15, 2031 | 0.02% | 0.19% |
| NORTH DAKOTA 5.75% 07/53, due Jul 1, 2053 | 0.02% | 0.39% |
| CENTRAL PLAINS VAR 05/53, due May 1, 2053 | 0.01% | 0.30% |
| NEW YORK ST DORM 4% 02/47, due Feb 15, 2047 | 0.01% | 1.22% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.
More: full overlap table · JMUB holdings · MNBD holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.