KAMO vs XFLX

Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF against FundX Flexible ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
9%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
KAMO is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
KAMO
$98M

Side by side

KAMOXFLX
FundKensington Credit Opportunities ETFFundX Flexible ETF
IssuerKensingtonFundX
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateAllocation
Expense ratio0.92%0.97%
Assets$98M$49M
Average daily dollar volume$620K$41K
ListedDec 16, 2025Jul 1, 2002
FrenzyCap score1319
1-month return−2.3%−0.3%
3-month return−2.2%−0.3%
Year to date−4.2%+0.8%
1-year return—−7.8%
30-day volatility4.6%2.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−10.6%
Trailing 12-month yield3.07%9.72%
Holdings814
Top 10 weight100.6%92.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$20M thru Jun 2026−$676K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

23% of KAMO · 9% of XFLX
HoldingKAMOXFLX
JAAA22.59%9.02%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · KAMO holdings · XFLX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.