KBA vs KSTR

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF against KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
12%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
33 bp
KBA is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.3 pts
KSTR is ahead
Larger fund
KSTR
$362M

Side by side

KBAKSTR
FundKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETFKraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF
IssuerKraneSharesKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.56%0.89%
Assets$117M$362M
Average daily dollar volume$1.2M$18M
ListedMar 4, 2014Jan 26, 2021
FrenzyCap score4441
1-month return−4.7%−5.3%
3-month return−6.3%−26.0%
Year to date−0.1%+13.3%
1-year return+2.7%+5.1%
30-day volatility12.3%31.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.9%−35.5%
Trailing 12-month yield1.57%—
Holdings5251
Top 10 weight49.1%62.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$40M thru Jun 2026+$129M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility52.6%44.0%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

12% of KBA · 27% of KSTR
HoldingKBAKSTR
Cambricon Technologies Corp Ltd5.13%9.90%
Hygon Information Technology Co Ltd4.41%8.51%
Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc China2.24%8.68%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · KBA holdings · KSTR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.