KCOP vs QYLD

Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF against Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
39 bp
QYLD is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QYLD
$8.5B

Side by side

KCOPQYLD
FundKurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETFGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerKurvGlobal X
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.99%0.60%
Assets$29M$8.5B
Average daily dollar volume$406K$69M
ListedFeb 12, 2026Dec 11, 2013
FrenzyCap score1882
1-month return−1.2%+2.5%
3-month return+6.0%+3.0%
Year to date—+5.8%
1-year return—+8.9%
30-day volatility37.2%5.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−22.5%−7.0%
Trailing 12-month yield9.00%11.40%
Holdings13104
Top 10 weight103.5%49.2%
Look-through P/E—35.0
Holdings vs fair value—−4.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—79%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$24M thru May 2026−$250M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility41.4%15.8%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · KCOP holdings · QYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.