KMLM vs MATE

KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF against Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
KMLM
$560M

Side by side

KMLMMATE
FundKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETFMan Active Trend Enhanced ETF
IssuerKraneSharesMan
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.90%—
Assets$560M—
Average daily dollar volume$13M$815K
ListedDec 1, 2020Dec 16, 2025
FrenzyCap score53—
1-month return−0.3%+6.6%
3-month return+8.1%+11.4%
Year to date+19.5%+30.0%
1-year return+15.4%—
30-day volatility12.4%14.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.6%−13.2%
Trailing 12-month yield4.20%—
Holdings26—
Top 10 weight102.7%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$35M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility23.2%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · KMLM holdings · MATE holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.