KURE vs THNR

KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF against Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
9%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
THNR is cheaper
1-year return gap
12.2 pts
THNR is ahead
Larger fund
KURE
$110M

Side by side

KURETHNR
FundKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETFAmplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF
IssuerKraneSharesAmplify
CategorySingle CountryGlobal
Expense ratio0.65%0.59%
Assets$110M$5.6M
Average daily dollar volume$1.5M$18K
ListedJan 31, 2018May 20, 2024
FrenzyCap score3822
1-month return+5.2%−4.6%
3-month return+11.0%−4.4%
Year to date+9.9%−2.8%
1-year return−12.6%−0.4%
30-day volatility29.4%19.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−29.7%−13.1%
Trailing 12-month yield3.82%1.69%
Holdings6321
Top 10 weight53.9%60.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value—−1.7%
Holdings above 200-day average—59%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$3.3M thru Jun 2026$0 thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility51.2%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

12% of KURE · 9% of THNR
HoldingKURETHNR
INNOVENT BIOLOGICS, INC.8.80%5.00%
CSPC PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP LIMITED3.68%4.48%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorKURETHNRGap
Health Care1.3%66.5%−65.3%

More: full overlap table · KURE holdings · THNR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.