KWH vs PAVE

GMO Power Infrastructure ETF against Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PAVE
$13.6B

Side by side

KWHPAVE
FundGMO Power Infrastructure ETFGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
IssuerGMOGlobal X
CategoryInfrastructureInfrastructure
Expense ratio—0.47%
Assets—$13.6B
Average daily dollar volume$46K$84M
ListedJul 14, 2026Mar 6, 2017
FrenzyCap score—84
1-month return−2.6%+0.2%
3-month return—−4.9%
Year to date—+11.8%
1-year return—+10.7%
30-day volatility15.8%16.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.5%−12.5%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.81%
Holdings—102
Top 10 weight—33.0%
Look-through P/E—33.0
Holdings vs fair value—+1.6%
Holdings above 200-day average—59%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$821M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—23.6%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · KWH holdings · PAVE holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.