LADM vs PSFF

Pacer Swan SOS Laddered Moderate ETF against Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
33%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
7 bp
LADM is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PSFF
$626M

Side by side

LADMPSFF
FundPacer Swan SOS Laddered Moderate ETFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF
IssuerPacerPacer
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.59%0.66%
Assets$1.6M$626M
Average daily dollar volume$33K$3.2M
ListedJun 25, 2026Dec 29, 2020
FrenzyCap score3256
1-month return+1.6%+1.8%
3-month return+2.9%+3.3%
Year to date—+9.7%
1-year return—+11.8%
30-day volatility3.8%4.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−3.7%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings1314
Top 10 weight82.5%92.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$825K thru Jul 2026+$9.4M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

33% of LADM · 55% of PSFF
HoldingLADMPSFF
PSMO8.28%14.57%
PSMD8.26%13.64%
PSMR8.25%13.18%
PSMJ8.19%13.69%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · LADM holdings · PSFF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.