LIT vs LITP

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF against Sprott Lithium Miners ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
33.3 pts
LIT is ahead
Larger fund
LIT
$1.5B

Side by side

LITLITP
FundGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETFSprott Lithium Miners ETF
IssuerGlobal XSprott
CategoryEVs & BatteriesEVs & Batteries
Expense ratio0.75%—
Assets$1.5B$31M
Average daily dollar volume$13M$446K
ListedJul 22, 2010Feb 1, 2023
FrenzyCap score4120
1-month return−2.9%−21.7%
3-month return−0.7%−22.0%
Year to date+7.5%−29.0%
1-year return+16.8%−16.4%
30-day volatility18.7%31.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−27.2%−52.9%
Trailing 12-month yield0.72%10.44%
Holdings46—
Top 10 weight57.0%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+3.3%—
Holdings above 200-day average0%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$194M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility28.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · LIT holdings · LITP holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.