LONZ vs PAAA

PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund against PGIM AAA CLO ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
44 bp
PAAA is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.0 pts
PAAA is ahead
Larger fund
PAAA
$10.2B

Side by side

LONZPAAA
FundPIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded FundPGIM AAA CLO ETF
IssuerPIMCOPGIM
CategoryBank Loans & CLOsBank Loans & CLOs
Expense ratio0.63%0.19%
Assets$680M$10.2B
Average daily dollar volume$5.0M$155M
ListedJun 8, 2022Jul 19, 2023
FrenzyCap score5287
1-month return−1.2%−0.1%
3-month return−0.9%0.0%
Year to date−3.1%+0.3%
1-year return−3.9%+0.1%
30-day volatility2.5%1.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.3%−0.7%
Trailing 12-month yield8.97%4.65%
Holdings365330
Top 10 weight9.1%11.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$201M thru Jun 2026+$2.6B thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of May 29, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of LONZ · 0% of PAAA

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · LONZ holdings · PAAA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.