LQD vs MCI

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF against Barings Corporate Investors: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
3.1 pts
LQD is ahead
Larger fund
LQD
$28.9B

Side by side

LQDMCI
FundiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFBarings Corporate Investors
IssueriSharesBarings
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateInvestment-Grade Corporate
Expense ratio0.14%—
Assets$28.9B$369M
Average daily dollar volume$3.6B$597K
ListedJul 22, 2002Jan 3, 1972
FrenzyCap score9140
1-month return−1.8%−4.9%
3-month return−2.9%+7.9%
Year to date−6.3%−1.2%
1-year return−8.3%−11.4%
30-day volatility6.8%24.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.8%−23.6%
Trailing 12-month yield4.89%—
Holdings3,185—
Top 10 weight1.5%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$9.8B thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility8.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · LQD holdings · MCI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.