LQD vs PBSC

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF against Pacer Barings Secured Credit Flex ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
35 bp
LQD is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
LQD
$28.9B

Side by side

LQDPBSC
FundiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFPacer Barings Secured Credit Flex ETF
IssueriSharesPacer
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateInvestment-Grade Corporate
Expense ratio0.14%0.49%
Assets$28.9B$86M
Average daily dollar volume$3.6B$56K
ListedJul 22, 2002Jun 22, 2026
FrenzyCap score9132
1-month return−1.8%−1.6%
3-month return−2.9%−1.4%
Year to date−6.3%—
1-year return−8.3%—
30-day volatility6.8%2.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.8%−2.1%
Trailing 12-month yield4.89%1.31%
Holdings3,185265
Top 10 weight1.5%10.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$9.8B thru May 2026+$86M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility8.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of LQD · 1% of PBSC
HoldingLQDPBSC
TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC 8.38%, due Jul 15, 20330.03%0.99%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · LQD holdings · PBSC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.