LQDM vs SPYI

Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF against NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
14 bp
LQDM is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
SPYI
$12.5B

Side by side

LQDMSPYI
FundAmplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETFNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerAmplifyNEOS
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.54%0.68%
Assets$2.2M$12.5B
Average daily dollar volume$130K$148M
ListedApr 20, 2026Aug 29, 2022
FrenzyCap score2884
1-month return−2.2%+1.7%
3-month return−5.1%+1.4%
Year to date—+3.0%
1-year return—+2.7%
30-day volatility6.8%8.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.9%−10.1%
Trailing 12-month yield5.28%11.72%
Holdings3510
Top 10 weight100.0%36.4%
Look-through P/E—26.0
Holdings vs fair value—+1.2%
Holdings above 200-day average—72%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.2M thru Jun 2026+$1.6B thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—10.5%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of LQDM · 0% of SPYI

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorLQDMSPYIGap
Technology0.0%45.0%−45.0%
Industrials0.0%10.7%−10.7%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%10.6%−10.6%
Financials0.0%9.2%−9.2%
Health Care0.0%7.9%−7.9%
Consumer Staples0.0%3.3%−3.3%
Utilities0.0%2.8%−2.8%
Energy0.0%2.5%−2.5%
Real Estate0.0%1.8%−1.8%
Materials0.0%1.6%−1.6%
Communication Services0.0%1.5%−1.5%

More: full overlap table · LQDM holdings · SPYI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.