LUNC vs SPHQ

Longnook Uncommon Compounders ETF against Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
SPHQ
$19.0B

Side by side

LUNCSPHQ
FundLongnook Uncommon Compounders ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
IssuerLongnookInvesco
CategoryQualityQuality
Expense ratio—0.15%
Assets—$19.0B
Average daily dollar volume$26K$88M
ListedSep 28, 2026Dec 6, 2005
FrenzyCap score—88
1-month return—+2.5%
3-month return—−1.1%
Year to date—+14.4%
1-year return—+16.2%
30-day volatility—9.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.5%−9.2%
Trailing 12-month yield—1.01%
Holdings—104
Top 10 weight—43.6%
Look-through P/E—25.4
Holdings vs fair value—+2.6%
Holdings above 200-day average—71%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$1.4B thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—13.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · LUNC holdings · SPHQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.