MAGS vs ZINN
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF against Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
45 bp
MAGS is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MAGS
$5.7B
Side by side
| MAGS | ZINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Virtus |
| Category | Internet & Innovation | Internet & Innovation |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.75% |
| Assets | $5.7B | — |
| Average daily dollar volume | $280M | $372K |
| Listed | Apr 10, 2023 | Aug 31, 2015 |
| FrenzyCap score | 78 | 16 |
| 1-month return | +6.6% | +11.1% |
| 3-month return | +10.1% | — |
| Year to date | +11.8% | — |
| 1-year return | +13.2% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 17.8% | 22.7% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −19.8% | −7.6% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.32% | — |
| Holdings | 24 | — |
| Top 10 weight | 87.4% | — |
| Look-through P/E | 29.9 | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | −4.5% | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 85% | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$372M thru Jun 2026 | — |
| 30-day implied volatility | 21.9% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · MAGS holdings · ZINN holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.