MBB vs SCEC

iShares MBS ETF against Sterling Capital Funds: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
35 bp
MBB is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.3 pts
MBB is ahead
Larger fund
MBB
$35.2B

Side by side

MBBSCEC
FundiShares MBS ETFSterling Capital Funds
IssueriSharesSterling
CategoryMortgage & SecuritizedMortgage & Securitized
Expense ratio0.04%0.39%
Assets$35.2B$585M
Average daily dollar volume$690M$2.1M
ListedMar 13, 2007Mar 13, 2025
FrenzyCap score9855
1-month return−1.0%−1.7%
3-month return−2.5%−2.9%
Year to date−4.9%−5.9%
1-year return−5.7%−7.0%
30-day volatility6.7%4.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.1%−8.0%
Trailing 12-month yield4.50%5.22%
Holdings10,818344
Top 10 weight6.0%17.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$179M thru May 2026+$81M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility7.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of MBB · 1% of SCEC
HoldingMBBSCEC
FNMA 30YR, due Oct 1, 20510.00%1.32%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · MBB holdings · SCEC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.