MCHS vs SMHC

Matthews International Funds Matthews China Innovators Active ETF against VanEck China Semiconductor ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
9%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
24 bp
SMHC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MCHS
$19M

Side by side

MCHSSMHC
FundMatthews International Funds Matthews China Innovators Active ETFVanEck China Semiconductor ETF
IssuerMatthews AsiaVanEck
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.89%0.65%
Assets$19M$6.8M
Average daily dollar volume$109K$791K
ListedJan 10, 2024Jun 23, 2026
FrenzyCap score1526
1-month return−2.7%−9.0%
3-month return−13.9%−29.4%
Year to date+19.6%—
1-year return+11.1%—
30-day volatility14.2%36.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−26.7%−39.8%
Trailing 12-month yield2.98%—
Holdings5125
Top 10 weight46.3%59.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$18M thru Jun 2026+$6.2M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility42.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

9% of MCHS · 24% of SMHC
HoldingMCHSSMHC
ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT INC5.10%6.14%
WUS PRINTED CIRCUIT (KUNSHAN)CO LTD2.45%4.00%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC LTD1.04%6.66%
HYGON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO LTD0.58%7.59%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorMCHSSMHCGap
Industrials1.4%0.0%+1.4%
Consumer Discretionary1.1%0.0%+1.1%

More: full overlap table · MCHS holdings · SMHC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.