MINT vs SCUB

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund against Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MINT
$18.3B

Side by side

MINTSCUB
FundPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded FundSterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
IssuerPIMCOSterling
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio0.36%—
Assets$18.3B—
Average daily dollar volume$222M$207K
ListedNov 16, 2009Nov 30, 2012
FrenzyCap score80—
1-month return−0.1%0.0%
3-month return−0.1%−0.3%
Year to date+0.1%—
1-year return+0.0%—
30-day volatility1.3%1.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.5%−0.9%
Trailing 12-month yield4.09%2.50%
Holdings1,019—
Top 10 weight13.4%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$430M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility3.4%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · MINT holdings · SCUB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.