MUB vs PML

iShares National Muni Bond ETF against PIMCO MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND II COMMON SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INT.: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
10.3 pts
MUB is ahead
Larger fund
MUB
$52.1B

Side by side

MUBPML
FundiShares National Muni Bond ETFPIMCO MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND II COMMON SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INT.
IssueriSharesPIMCO
CategoryNational MuniNational Muni
Expense ratio0.05%—
Assets$52.1B$848M
Average daily dollar volume$1.8B$6.8M
ListedSep 7, 2007Jun 26, 2002
FrenzyCap score9966
1-month return−0.3%−0.3%
3-month return−2.7%−7.1%
Year to date−4.3%−10.3%
1-year return−4.7%−15.0%
30-day volatility6.3%17.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.9%−18.9%
Trailing 12-month yield3.33%—
Holdings7,665—
Top 10 weight1.2%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.4B thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility7.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · MUB holdings · PML holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.