MUYY vs QQQI

GraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETF against NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
39 bp
QQQI is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QQQI
$15.1B

Side by side

MUYYQQQI
FundGraniteShares YieldBOOST MU ETFNEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
IssuerGraniteSharesNEOS
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio1.07%0.68%
Assets$18M$15.1B
Average daily dollar volume$472K$219M
ListedApr 13, 2026Jan 29, 2024
FrenzyCap score1081
1-month return−6.7%+4.0%
3-month return−16.4%+1.6%
Year to date—+4.5%
1-year return—+2.4%
30-day volatility14.7%12.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−32.0%−13.7%
Trailing 12-month yield52.08%13.58%
Holdings12105
Top 10 weight32.2%45.1%
Look-through P/E—34.5
Holdings vs fair value—−3.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—77%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$18M thru Jun 2026+$2.4B thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—13.2%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · MUYY holdings · QQQI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.