NDAA vs TBFG

Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF against The Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
14%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
19 bp
TBFG is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.3 pts
TBFG is ahead
Larger fund
TBFG
$385M

Side by side

NDAATBFG
FundNed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETFThe Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF
IssuerNedThe Brinsmere
CategoryTactical & RotationLarge Cap Growth
Expense ratio0.65%0.46%
Assets$4.5M$385M
Average daily dollar volume$238K$27K
ListedOct 16, 2024Jan 12, 2024
FrenzyCap score3035
1-month return−1.3%−1.9%
3-month return+1.4%+0.9%
Year to date+10.4%+8.6%
1-year return+9.0%+9.4%
30-day volatility8.2%8.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.6%−7.8%
Trailing 12-month yield2.45%2.44%
Holdings2924
Top 10 weight66.0%66.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.1M thru Jun 2026−$4.7M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 1, 2026third-party dataas of Sep 30, 2026third-party data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

15% of NDAA · 18% of TBFG
HoldingNDAATBFG
SPY6.57%8.79%
SPMD5.18%3.78%
SPSM3.73%5.78%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · NDAA holdings · TBFG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.