NLR vs TNUK

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF against Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
NLR
$3.5B

Side by side

NLRTNUK
FundVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETFTortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF
IssuerVanEckTortoise
CategoryNuclear & UraniumNuclear & Uranium
Expense ratio0.52%—
Assets$3.5B—
Average daily dollar volume$42M$19K
ListedAug 13, 2007Dec 16, 2025
FrenzyCap score68—
1-month return−12.3%−4.5%
3-month return−5.6%−4.2%
Year to date−16.8%−8.8%
1-year return−29.0%—
30-day volatility39.7%28.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−37.7%−26.4%
Trailing 12-month yield3.06%—
Holdings27—
Top 10 weight63.6%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value−3.4%—
Holdings above 200-day average15%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$256M thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility36.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · NLR holdings · TNUK holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.