NUKZ vs UX

Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF against Roundhill Uranium ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
8 bp
UX is cheaper
1-year return gap
10.0 pts
UX is ahead
Larger fund
NUKZ
$690M

Side by side

NUKZUX
FundRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETFRoundhill Uranium ETF
IssuerRangeRoundhill
CategoryNuclear & UraniumNuclear & Uranium
Expense ratio0.85%0.77%
Assets$690M$4.5M
Average daily dollar volume$7.3M$77K
ListedJan 10, 2024Jan 28, 2025
FrenzyCap score443
1-month return−5.3%−3.1%
3-month return−4.3%+2.9%
Year to date−3.5%−4.7%
1-year return−11.0%−1.0%
30-day volatility25.8%27.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−21.0%−26.1%
Trailing 12-month yield0.94%1.55%
Holdings465
Top 10 weight36.2%103.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+9.0%—
Holdings above 200-day average27%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$27M thru May 2026+$1.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility29.9%31.7%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of NUKZ · 0% of UX

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorNUKZUXGap
Industrials23.5%0.0%+23.5%
Utilities20.8%0.0%+20.8%
Materials18.9%0.0%+18.9%
Technology0.9%0.0%+0.9%

More: full overlap table · NUKZ holdings · UX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.