PDX vs QQQI

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund against NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
6.0 pts
QQQI is ahead
Larger fund
QQQI
$13.1B

Side by side

PDXQQQI
FundPIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy FundNEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
IssuerPIMCONEOS
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio—0.68%
Assets$908M$13.1B
Average daily dollar volume$2.5M$251M
Listed—Jan 29, 2024
FrenzyCap score5882
1-month return−0.5%−3.3%
3-month return−4.7%+1.2%
Year to date+8.1%+0.3%
1-year return−7.9%−1.9%
30-day volatility16.9%14.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−17.3%−13.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—15.32%
Holdings—106
Top 10 weight—47.8%
Look-through P/E—31.8
Holdings vs fair value—−0.4%
Holdings above 200-day average—70%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$2.4B thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—14.9%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 7, 2026third-party data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · PDX holdings · QQQI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.