PFL vs QYLD

PIMCO Income Strategy Fund against Global X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
24.9 pts
QYLD is ahead
Larger fund
QYLD
$8.3B

Side by side

PFLQYLD
FundPIMCO Income Strategy FundGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerPIMCOGlobal X
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio—0.60%
Assets$335M$8.3B
Average daily dollar volume$2.2M$78M
ListedAug 27, 2003Dec 11, 2013
FrenzyCap score5084
1-month return−2.5%−2.4%
3-month return−12.3%+2.9%
Year to date−20.2%+2.2%
1-year return−20.3%+4.6%
30-day volatility18.9%9.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−22.1%−7.0%
Trailing 12-month yield—11.85%
Holdings—104
Top 10 weight—47.5%
Look-through P/E—31.9
Holdings vs fair value—+0.7%
Holdings above 200-day average—70%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—−$250M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—32.6%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 22, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · PFL holdings · QYLD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.