PULS vs SCUB
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF against Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PULS
$19.4B
Side by side
| PULS | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF |
| Issuer | PGIM | Sterling |
| Category | Ultra-Short Bond | Ultra-Short Bond |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | — |
| Assets | $19.4B | — |
| Average daily dollar volume | $188M | $207K |
| Listed | Apr 5, 2018 | Nov 30, 2012 |
| FrenzyCap score | 90 | — |
| 1-month return | −0.1% | 0.0% |
| 3-month return | −0.1% | −0.3% |
| Year to date | −0.1% | — |
| 1-year return | −0.3% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −0.7% | −0.9% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 4.38% | 2.50% |
| Holdings | 730 | — |
| Top 10 weight | 6.4% | — |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$2.1B thru May 2026 | — |
| 30-day implied volatility | 3.7% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of May 29, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · PULS holdings · SCUB holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.