PULS vs SOFR

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF against Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
PULS is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.4 pts
SOFR is ahead
Larger fund
PULS
$19.6B

Side by side

PULSSOFR
FundPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETFAmplify Samsung SOFR ETF
IssuerPGIMAmplify
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Assets$19.6B$463M
Average daily dollar volume$182M$433K
ListedApr 5, 2018Nov 14, 2023
FrenzyCap score9039
1-month return−0.1%−0.0%
3-month return−0.2%−0.0%
Year to date−0.1%+0.1%
1-year return−0.4%−0.0%
30-day volatility1.0%1.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.7%−0.8%
Trailing 12-month yield4.38%3.71%
Holdings7307
Top 10 weight6.4%6.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.1B thru May 2026+$32M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility14.7%—
Holdings as ofas of May 29, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 15, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of PULS · 0% of SOFR

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · PULS holdings · SOFR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.