PYLD vs RDFI

PIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF against Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
367 bp
PYLD is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.2 pts
PYLD is ahead
Larger fund
PYLD
$16.8B

Side by side

PYLDRDFI
FundPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETFRareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
IssuerPIMCORareview
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.56%4.23%
Assets$16.8B$72M
Average daily dollar volume$193M$692K
ListedJun 21, 2023Oct 20, 2020
FrenzyCap score7124
1-month return+1.0%+2.8%
3-month return−1.8%−6.6%
Year to date−3.9%−8.3%
1-year return−4.0%−8.2%
30-day volatility4.2%11.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.4%−14.1%
Trailing 12-month yield6.50%8.87%
Holdings2,02539
Top 10 weight26.4%46.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$7.3M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Nov 6, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of PYLD · 0% of RDFI

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · PYLD holdings · RDFI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.