QLD vs WEBX

ProShares Ultra QQQ against Corgi Chinese Internet 2x Daily ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
50 bp
WEBX is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QLD
$14.6B

Side by side

QLDWEBX
FundProShares Ultra QQQCorgi Chinese Internet 2x Daily ETF
IssuerProSharesCorgi
CategoryLeveraged EquityLeveraged Equity
Expense ratio0.95%0.45%
Assets$14.6B$265K
Average daily dollar volume$354M$2K
ListedJun 19, 2006Jun 2, 2026
FrenzyCap score8138
1-month return+6.2%+1.8%
3-month return+7.5%−19.0%
Year to date+31.2%—
1-year return+36.2%—
30-day volatility30.9%47.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−25.2%−34.3%
Trailing 12-month yield0.13%—
Holdings1262
Top 10 weight111.7%199.2%
Look-through P/E32.2—
Holdings vs fair value−0.6%—
Holdings above 200-day average76%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$197M thru May 2026+$317K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility38.9%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 15, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 15, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · QLD holdings · WEBX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.