QPX vs SECT

AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF against Main Sector Rotation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
40%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
105 bp
SECT is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.5 pts
SECT is ahead
Larger fund
SECT
$2.9B

Side by side

QPXSECT
FundAdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETFMain Sector Rotation ETF
IssuerAdvisorSharesMain Management
CategoryMulti-FactorTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio1.74%0.69%
Assets$35M$2.9B
Average daily dollar volume$164K$10M
ListedDec 28, 2020Sep 5, 2017
FrenzyCap score754
1-month return+2.1%+2.9%
3-month return+2.0%+2.8%
Year to date+9.8%+13.1%
1-year return+11.8%+14.4%
30-day volatility13.3%11.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.6%−11.0%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.68%
Holdings813
Top 10 weight97.7%97.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$3.6M thru Jun 2026+$81M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility23.2%15.4%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

50% of QPX · 53% of SECT
HoldingQPXSECT
XLK21.43%33.05%
XLY19.25%9.67%
XLC9.00%10.51%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · QPX holdings · SECT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.