QQQI vs TPAY

NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF against Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
19 bp
TPAY is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
QQQI
$15.1B

Side by side

QQQITPAY
FundNEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETFRoundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF
IssuerNEOSRoundhill
CategoryCovered CallCovered Call
Expense ratio0.68%0.49%
Assets$15.1B$1.6M
Average daily dollar volume$219M$71K
ListedJan 29, 2024Feb 17, 2026
FrenzyCap score8128
1-month return+4.0%+2.7%
3-month return+1.6%+2.0%
Year to date+4.5%—
1-year return+2.4%—
30-day volatility12.0%10.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.7%−9.4%
Trailing 12-month yield13.58%7.74%
Holdings1053
Top 10 weight45.1%95.1%
Look-through P/E34.5—
Holdings vs fair value−3.8%—
Holdings above 200-day average77%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.4B thru Jun 2026$0 thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility13.2%63.1%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · QQQI holdings · TPAY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.