RMRC vs TDSB

ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF against Exchange Listed Funds Trust ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
20%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
33 bp
RMRC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
TDSB
$48M

Side by side

RMRCTDSB
FundARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETFExchange Listed Funds Trust ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF
IssuerARMORExchange
CategoryBufferAllocation
Expense ratio0.58%0.91%
Assets$7.1M$48M
Average daily dollar volume$29K$122K
ListedFeb 23, 2026Sep 16, 2020
FrenzyCap score3221
1-month return−0.0%−0.0%
3-month return−0.5%+0.9%
Year to date—+3.2%
1-year return—+4.1%
30-day volatility8.5%6.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.8%−5.1%
Trailing 12-month yield0.94%1.91%
Holdings1211
Top 10 weight93.9%99.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$6.8M thru May 2026−$12K thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

21% of RMRC · 20% of TDSB
HoldingRMRCTDSB
XLU10.62%10.10%
XLV10.02%9.70%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · RMRC holdings · TDSB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.