RMRC vs TDSC

ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF against Exchange Listed Funds Trust ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
36%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
32 bp
RMRC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
TDSC
$104M

Side by side

RMRCTDSC
FundARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETFExchange Listed Funds Trust ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
IssuerARMORExchange
CategoryBufferAllocation
Expense ratio0.58%0.90%
Assets$7.1M$104M
Average daily dollar volume$29K$156K
ListedFeb 23, 2026Sep 16, 2020
FrenzyCap score3224
1-month return−0.0%+1.3%
3-month return−0.5%+3.3%
Year to date—+13.4%
1-year return—+14.4%
30-day volatility8.5%8.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.8%−5.5%
Trailing 12-month yield0.94%1.30%
Holdings1211
Top 10 weight93.9%99.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$6.8M thru May 2026−$1.4M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—12.8%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

37% of RMRC · 46% of TDSC
HoldingRMRCTDSC
XLV10.02%13.10%
XLK9.70%10.61%
XLU10.62%9.64%
XLE6.83%12.16%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · RMRC holdings · TDSC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.