SMLL vs XMHQ

Harbor Active Small Cap ETF against Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
7%
7 shared positions
Fee gap
55 bp
XMHQ is cheaper
1-year return gap
10.7 pts
XMHQ is ahead
Larger fund
XMHQ
$5.5B

Side by side

SMLLXMHQ
FundHarbor Active Small Cap ETFInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
IssuerHarborInvesco
CategorySmall Cap BlendQuality
Expense ratio0.80%0.25%
Assets$13M$5.5B
Average daily dollar volume$46K$20M
ListedAug 28, 2024Dec 1, 2006
FrenzyCap score1780
1-month return−0.8%+0.2%
3-month return−3.4%+1.4%
Year to date+3.2%+11.5%
1-year return−2.5%+8.2%
30-day volatility13.5%12.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.5%−8.4%
Trailing 12-month yield2.30%0.57%
Holdings4884
Top 10 weight39.1%30.3%
Look-through P/E21.819.2
Holdings vs fair value+19.0%+10.9%
Holdings above 200-day average45%51%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$503K thru Jul 2026−$100M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility23.5%17.1%
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

13% of SMLL · 7% of XMHQ
HoldingSMLLXMHQ
TTC2.32%1.41%
RRC1.87%1.22%
CART1.25%1.08%
KNSL1.03%1.19%
DOCS1.54%0.74%
MIDD2.19%0.69%
MORN3.19%0.64%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorSMLLXMHQGap
Industrials46.5%30.6%+15.9%
Financials17.2%18.1%−0.9%
Technology12.2%15.8%−3.7%
Health Care1.7%13.3%−11.6%
Materials3.5%8.8%−5.3%
Consumer Discretionary1.8%8.1%−6.4%
Energy5.7%1.8%+3.8%
Real Estate3.8%0.0%+3.8%
Utilities1.5%0.8%+0.7%
Consumer Staples1.2%1.0%+0.2%
Communication Services0.0%1.5%−1.5%

More: full overlap table · SMLL holdings · XMHQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.