UMI vs USNG

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund against Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
49%
12 shared positions
Fee gap
10 bp
USNG is cheaper
1-year return gap
11.4 pts
USNG is ahead
Larger fund
UMI
$516M

Side by side

UMIUSNG
FundUSCF Midstream Energy Income FundAmplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
IssuerUSCFAmplify
CategoryMultisector BondInfrastructure
Expense ratio0.69%0.59%
Assets$516M$7.4M
Average daily dollar volume$1.9M$159K
ListedMar 24, 2021May 19, 2025
FrenzyCap score3625
1-month return−3.9%−0.4%
3-month return−3.9%−0.7%
Year to date+19.1%+29.1%
1-year return+14.7%+26.0%
30-day volatility13.5%19.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.2%−12.2%
Trailing 12-month yield6.06%1.26%
Holdings2327
Top 10 weight63.1%64.6%
Look-through P/E17.424.4
Holdings vs fair value+20.3%−0.8%
Holdings above 200-day average56%63%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$27M thru Jun 2026+$1.0M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

67% of UMI · 53% of USNG
HoldingUMIUSNG
WMB7.35%8.11%
ENB7.03%6.56%
KMI6.21%6.96%
MPLX4.70%6.61%
TRP4.39%4.00%
DTM6.27%3.99%
PAGP4.55%3.85%
TRGP6.87%3.58%
ET7.74%3.47%
WES3.00%3.00%
LNG3.63%2.02%
OKE4.80%0.76%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorUMIUSNGGap
Utilities55.2%46.7%+8.4%
Energy26.9%18.3%+8.6%
Industrials0.0%23.3%−23.3%
Materials0.0%3.0%−3.0%

More: full overlap table · UMI holdings · USNG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.